> [Krimel] > I would say this is exactly the point I have been trying to make for a > slightly different angle. I think phenomenologically we need to understand > how it is that we have experiences or if you prefer how "we" are > differentiated by experience. I think understanding how we detect patterns > and make meaning is important and I think the neuroscience have a great > deal > to add to the discussion.
DM: I agree that we should get whatever insights we can from science. But it Adds to the enquiry it should not be seen as the only form of enquiry. [Krimel] As you well know science is much better at telling us what is not rather than what is. We now know, to give a classic example, that all swans are not white. I think the most rabid critics of science on this forum fear science because it has in many cases it has already written off as false many of their cherished assumptions. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
