At 03:54 PM 9/10/2008, you wrote:
he "toleration" is nothing to do with me Marsha, the online identities
are tolerated / trusted by all who interact with them. The only person
with any actual power to decide if an identity is "valid" is Horse.
But I see Arlo has picked-up the "identity" question ... I'd agree
with the general point it's not about a name, or even a zip code or
phone number - they can all change - it's about the constancy and
consistency (or not) of many overlapping patterns ... mainly patterns
of text and "behaviour" in e-mails, since we are an e-mail forum, with
little else to go on.
Are you naive to expect trust and honesty betweeen posters ? No you
are not, but trust has to be earned (whatever anyone's name).
Ian
Ian,
Twenty years ago I might agree with you that trust has to be
earned. Today I'm willing to believe people will be honest. I
understand that people make mistakes and every set of patterns has a
different experience and therefore may perceive a different
truth. But I want to believe people are being as honest as
possible. It provides a better living experience. Of course I have
been mistaken, but so what. I acknowledge that death may be an
instant away, and I don't want evaluating trustworthiness to dominate
my experience. Besides, intuition really directs my interactions
with the world. So I don't really think much about it. Well, except
for now in this forum. But I'll get over it.
Marsha
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:36 PM, MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 06:09 PM 9/8/2008, you wrote:
>>
>> "The Old Plant" was of course a spoof from the outset Marsha ... it
>> just landed in the forum at a moment when others would rather not hear
>> the idea of a hoax you may recall. My timing never was that good.
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> At the time, there was only shock! It had to do with honesty and trust,
> and it took me a while to readjust.
>
>
>> I'm confused about doubts about multiple "false" identities - there
>> clearly are / have been a few. They are tolerated so long intent is
>> not low-quality.
>
> They are tolerated??? Who is the "they"? Where is the definition of
> "tolerated"? And who decides to the placement on the value on a
high-to-low
> scale? Have you been making these assessments? Please share your
> involvement on the Board.
>
> If individuals want to construct new identities, there are obviously
> websites where this is the purpose. Go! Have a good time. It
seems honest
> because everybody knows that it's happening. But, pardon me, I
thought that
> in a MOQ forum, honesty, at least, would be valued.
>
> Seems to me there's a difference between anonymity and bullshit. I don't
> buy Arlo's rationalizations for this forum. Am I naive to expect trust and
> honesty between posters? Are Krimel, SA, Margaret, Chris and
Ron just Arlo
> amusing himself,? And that's not a problem?
>
> Gee, I'm really stupid, aren't I?
>
> Hahahahaha.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> Ian
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 4:48 PM, MarshaV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > At 04:25 PM 9/8/2008, you wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >> I think the general conclusion I have come to is
>> >> that this forum IS virtually meaningless...
>> >>
>> >> thanks for opening my eyes to that one..
>> >>
>> >> this, the mad hatters tea party..
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Ron,
>> >
>> > Relax. A couple of years ago Ian came out with a post claiming he had
>> > uncovered the fact that Platt was RMP. I went into deep shock. My
>> > trust
>> > ratio went to zero for a while.
>> >
>> > If nobody in this forum is being deceptive and dishonest within the
>> > forum,
>> > it might just be an interesting discussion. The topic of self
>> > (identities)
>> > is fascinating when patterns are interrelated and constantly changing.
>> >
>> > What do you think? Might this be a chance to empty some of that tea?
>> >
>> > Marsha
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > .
>> > .
>> >
>> > Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the
>> > stars.........
>> > .
>> > .
>> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> > Archives:
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> >
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
> .
> .
>
> Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
> .
> .
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
.
.
Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars.........
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
