[Ron] Well, who or what do you feel should be banned and why? [Arlo] Again, I agree with social law that holds the "ball of yarn" accountable. I support this because it is necessary for social stability. Some here did NOT think this person (or any of his identities here) should be banned. My contention was (and is) that it has nothing to do with his use of pseudonyms or avatars or identities, but that there was a malicious intent to harm. And for that I hold the ball accountable, even if I know the ball is a Gestalt illusion.
[Ron] You maintain we should value the words not the identity. If they have no value whats the harm? [Arlo] This is the difference between peaceable assembly and rioting. There was no harm in dissent, no harm in disagreement, no harm in proposing alternate ideas. But this person took it too far when deliberately tried to hurt others via social ridicule. I don't feel like rehashing this in its entirety, you can look up the dialogue in the archives. This person already got more "fame" than he deserves, I don't intent to add more at this point. I bring it up only because of your claim that I seemingly dismiss honesty and integrity. Ron: But I ask you, isn't this what Krimel does and writes it off to being a wizard of Norrath where social ridicule is something "that wizards will do"? why is this any different? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
