Correct, In action, reasoning involves a conscious attempt to discover what is 
true and what is best.
 
Western culture defines what is true and what is best by means of mathematics 
and logic which is predicated on the syllogism. Therefore, “reason” is defined 
in western culture as “SOM”,  therefore, in many ways reason may be
associated as SOM as per standard western cultural definition.
But, as for an MoQ definition, “reason” is defined  in an anti essentialist way 
and therefore transcends the 
typical western definition in a more universal way to include all attempts to 
discover what is true and best.
 
Aye, this is what makes MoQ more empirical for it transcends cutural 
definitions of intellectual pattern.
 
 

 



________________________________
From: Horse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2008 4:20:12 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Democracy

Hi Platt

The piece you quoted was Annotation 132 in Lila's Child which was in reply to 
your comment:

"To fill the hole may require a new level above SOM. I’m not sure about this. 
After all,
the MOQ is an SOM document based on SOM reasoning."
Annotation 132 follows.

Pirsig's reply still doesn't equate Reason with SOM. What it says is that SOM 
employs reason, indicating that reason is an Intellectual POV. The MOQ also 
employs reason, as shown in one of your favourite quotes:

"Taken by itself that seems obvious enough. But what’s not so obvious is that, 
given a value-centered Metaphysics of Quality, it is absolutely, scientifically 
moral for a doctor to prefer the patient. This is not just an arbitrary social 
convention that should apply to some doctors but not to all doctors, or to some 
cultures but not all cultures. It’s true for all people at all time, now and 
forever, a moral pattern of reality as real as H2O. We’re at last dealing with 
morals on the basis of reason. We can now deduce codes based on evolution that 
analyze moral arguments with
greater precision than before." (Chapter 13 Lila)

So reason is not SOM because if it was then we would have SOM (Valueless) being 
used to support the MOQ (nothing but value) which would be a complete 
contradiction.

Another indication from Pirsig that SOM and Reason are not identical is the 
following:

"The intellectual level of patterns, in the historic process of freeing itself 
from its parent social level, namely the church, has tended to invent a myth of 
independence from the social level for its own benefit. Science and reason, 
this myth goes, come only from the objective world, never from the social 
world. The world of objects imposes itself upon the mind with no social 
mediation whatsoever. It is easy to see the historic reasons for this myth of 
independence. Science might never have survived without it. But a close 
examination shows it isn’t so." (Chapter 12 Lila)

I think the main problem I have with the idea that SOM and Reason are identical 
is that in order for this to be correct, then Bo's SOL would be correct and I 
just don't believe this is the case. And neither does Pirsig, so I'm in pretty 
good company.


Cheers Platt

Horse

PS
Thanks to you (and Andre) for the nice things you said about me - I do 
appreciate it.


Platt Holden wrote:
> Hi Horse, 
> [Horse wrote]
>  
>> So can you give me an instance of where Pirsig specifically equates reason 
>> with SOM.
>>    
> 
> "It employs SOM reasoning the way SOM reasoning employs social structures 
> such as courts and journals and learned societies to make itself known.  SOM 
> reasoning is not subordinate to these social structures, and the MOQ is not 
> subordinate to the SOM structures it employs.  Remember that the central 
> reality of the MOQ is not an object or a subject or anything else.  It is 
> understood by direct experience only and not by reasoning of any kind.  
> Therefore to say that the MOQ is based on SOM reasoning is as useful as 
> saying that the Ten Commandments are based on SOM reasoning.  It doesn't tell 
> us anything about the essence of the Ten Commandments and it doesn't tell us 
> anything about the essence of the MOQ." (Note 132, LC)
> 
> Platt
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>> Platt Holden wrote:
>>    
>>>> Hi Platt
>>>> 
>>>> Just a minor point - why do equate reason (or "reason alone") with SOM.
>>>> Surely reason is an intellectual POV and not a whole metaphysical
>>>> system.
>>>> 
>>>> Horse
>>>>            
>>> Hi Horse,
>>> 
>>> Bo has given a fine answer to your question. Here's another one.  From
>>>      
>> the    
>>> Wikipedia entry on "reason:"
>>> 
>>> "Reasoning thought follows a chain of cause and effect, and the word 
>>> 'reason' can be a synonym for 'cause.' "
>>> 
>>> >From Note 56, Lila's Child:
>>> 
>>> "The word 'produced' implies that  Dynamic quality is a part of a cause
>>>      
>> and    
>>> effect system of the kind generated by scientific thinking.  But Dynamic
>>> Quality cannot be part of any cause and effect system since all cause
>>>      
>> and    
>>> effect systems are static patterns."
>>> 
>>> Great to hear from you. It gives me an opportunity to express my 
>>> appreciation for the high quality of your design and maintenance of      
>> this    
>>> site. All participants past and present owe you a debt of gratitude if
>>>      
>> not    
>>> cash contributions which you have repeatedly refused to ask for or
>>>      
>> accept.    
>>> Be assured, however, that your efforts have not been overlooked or 
>>> forgotten. I know I speak for many here in saying, "Thanks."
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Platt        
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
> 
>  

-- 
Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely 
in an attractive and well preserved body, but to skid in sideways, chocolate in 
one hand, wine in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and 
screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"... Hunter S Thompson


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to