Hi Marsha,

You make my point ... as did Lila ...
The issue is inescapable and clearly it is wrong to treat it is as a
question that "GOF-intellect" can answer directly.
By asking it as a stark question I make that apparent.

I see it more as a process for dealing with it ie the question and the
answer are much more dynamic, living, circular ... strange-loopy.

Thanks
Ian

On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:58 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Who decides?   Who decides?  Everybody thinks they are on the side of right.
>  It's the way Lila said it was...   There's no way "he" can be wrong...  It
> just goes, on and on and on...  Left?  Right?  Middle?  It just circles back
> onto itself one way or the other.  There is no escaping it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> At 04:06 AM 1/8/2009, you wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve,
>>
>> I don't think we needed Ken Wilbur to point out that you need to break
>> a few eggs to make an omlette.
>> Achieving something better always involves damaging / disadvantaging /
>> hurting / killing / destroying something else - Darwin formalized that
>> process. The only thing inherent or essential about human nature is
>> that it is evolved & evolving. When the power of better ideas fails to
>> persuade (at the intellectual level), Pirsig (and Nietzsche and
>> others) show us that physical force is morally empowered to overcome
>> physical force (at the social and biological levels). There are
>> morally just uses of lethal violence, from the individual, right up to
>> the the scale of wars. I don't think any of us are "pacifists"
>> pussyfooting around that.
>>
>> The question is begged of who decides when the "stronger violence is
>> in saner hands" and whether the moral balance is net positive - when
>> is it "sane" to hurt / kill / destroy for some "greater good" ? Basic
>> ethics / moral philosophy.
>>
>> It is what I keep coming back to - "governance" in a general sense -
>> who decides, and how ? We have a framework (the MoQ) for how these
>> issues of value relate, but who decides ?
>> That "sanity" is in the intellectual level of individuals. What should
>> the relationship be between individual intellects and collective
>> societies - where (if any) are the (enforcable) social limits to (act
>> on) intellectual freedom ?
>>
>> Ian
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Steven Peterson
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Hi Marsha, Arlo, Ron,
>> >
>> > I dabbled in pacificism for a while, but Pirsig among others convinced
>> > me that humans are not intrinsically good. This is not to say that
>> > they are intrinsically evil, either. Pragmatists have given up for
>> > looking for essences which includes trying to talk about human nature
>> > as good or evil because we don't want to talk about an essence of
>> > humanity either.
>> >
>> > Can we achieve are goals without ever resorting to violence (including
>> > participating in a governement that has a police force and a
>> > military)? I doubt it. As Ken Wilbur pointed out, the only thing that
>> > has ever controlled violence is stronger violence in saner hands.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Steve
>> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> > Archives:
>> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>> >
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
> .
> .
> Albert Einstein:  "Although I am a typical loner in daily life, my
> consciousness of belonging to the invisible community of those who strive
> for truth, beauty and justice has preserved me from feeling isolated."
> .
> .
> .
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to