>[Marsha] >In place of 'causes', the Buddhist might say 'mutually interdependent >causes and conditions'. I think this is closer to RMP's use of >'value', where value creates both subject and object. > >[Krimel] >Or the enlightened Buddhist speak of probability.
[Marsha] Are you saying the definition of probability is 'mutual interdependent causes and conditions'? Or was that sarcasm? [Krimel] I was not being sarcastic. 'Mutual interdependent causes and conditions' is closer to the mark than 'value'. Probability and "mutual interdependence" are as the ear is to the tail of the elephant. Value seems closer to a byproduct, something an elephant might leave on a path that even blind monks could easily identify. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
