At 03:58 PM 1/15/2009, you wrote:
>[Marsha]
>In place of 'causes', the Buddhist might say 'mutually interdependent
>causes and conditions'. I think this is closer to RMP's use of
>'value', where value creates both subject and object.
>
>[Krimel]
>Or the enlightened Buddhist speak of probability.
[Marsha]
Are you saying the definition of probability is 'mutual
interdependent causes and conditions'? Or was that sarcasm?
[Krimel]
I was not being sarcastic. 'Mutual interdependent causes and conditions' is
closer to the mark than 'value'. Probability and "mutual interdependence"
are as the ear is to the tail of the elephant. Value seems closer to a
byproduct, something an elephant might leave on a path that even blind monks
could easily identify.
I thought you might have some interesting point. But you're just
full of poop! Never mind. Pontificate away!
.
.
The Universe is uncaused, like a net of jewels in which each is a
reflection of all the others in a fantastic, interrelated harmony without end.
.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
