> >[Marsha] > >In place of 'causes', the Buddhist might say 'mutually interdependent > >causes and conditions'. I think this is closer to RMP's use of > >'value', where value creates both subject and object. > > > >[Krimel] > >Or the enlightened Buddhist speak of probability. > >[Marsha] >Are you saying the definition of probability is 'mutual >interdependent causes and conditions'? Or was that sarcasm? > >[Krimel] > I was not being sarcastic. 'Mutual interdependent causes and conditions' > is closer to the mark than 'value'. Probability and "mutual > interdependence"are as the ear is to the tail of the elephant. Value seems
> closer to a byproduct, something an elephant might leave on a path that > even blind monks could easily identify. [Marsha] I thought you might have some interesting point. But you're just full of poop! Never mind. Pontificate away! [Krimel] Good call! Fly away little pixie. Spread your dust hither and thither. All that matters is that you believe and that the children believe in you. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
