> [Michael] > Again: faith = affirmation absent proof. > > [Arlo] > Let me ask it this way.
MP: Again, Arlo, *you* are making the infinite reductionist argument (not *I*) that we need faith (definition 2) for everything in your attempt to protect MoQ from what is in fact only your perception that I am saying it takes faith (definition 1) to hold it. I don't make the infinite reductionist argument because its nihilistically pointless and leads to no conclusion whatsoever AND I'm not making the criticism of MoQ you think I am. See my post to Andre. MP ---- "Don't believe everything you think." Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
