[Michael] Again, Arlo, *you* are making the infinite reductionist argument (not *I*) that we need faith (definition 2) for everything in your attempt to protect MoQ from what is in fact only your perception that I am saying it takes faith (definition 1) to hold it.
[Arlo] Oh really? Give me an example of any philosophy or idea you feel we can know absent "faith". You seem to allude to the idea that "science" is not based in faith. Is that right? Or is science rooted in faith as well (in your opinion)? If *I* am making the "reductionist argument", then prove me wrong. Give me examples, in your opinion, of ideas we can hold absent "faith". I've already said the MOQ is one such idea that requires no faith. YOU say, uh uh, the MOQ requires faith too. So, what DOES NOT require "faith", in your opinion? Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
