> [Platt] > You bet chance and DQ are different. The former identifies ignorance of > underlying cause. The latter identifies speechless, wondrous surprise. > > [Arlo] > Apples and oranges. > > BOTH identify "speechless, wondrous surprise". You have a "chance" at > winning > the lottery, I bet when you do you are speechless and feeling wondrous. > > BOTH chance and DQ recognize that "cause" is SOM trap. Instead, events > occur in > a field of interwoven activity among inorganic, biological, social and > intellectual responses to DQ, and these responses are constrained and > enabled > by the complexity of the pattern, a set of probability-to-respond, none > pre-determined, none guaranteed, but instead carrying particular > moment-to-moment "chances" or probabilities to occur. > > By the way, "DQ causes events to occur" traps the cosmos without free will > or > agency. Your cat would evidence no preference to eat, as it has no > choice, > since DQ "causes" it to eat. Since this is not true, DQ does not "cause" > anything to happen, your cat evidences probability that it will eat, but > also > probability that it will not. Its up to your cat. > > But please, try again, what are the DISTINCTIONS between chance and DQ you > keep > alluding to? Intent? Plan? (I know its these, I'm just waiting to see if > you > have the integrity and brass to just say it.)
You know? Utterly hilarious. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
