Marsha, "But static patterns, nevertheless, provide a necessary stabilizing force to protect Dynamic progress from degeneration. Although Dynamic Quality, the Quality of freedom, creates this world in which we live, these patterns of static quality, the quality of order, preserve our world. Neither static nor Dynamic Quality can survive without the other." (Lila, 9)
Does this passage answer your question? Platt > Platt, > > Does RMP specifically use the word 'progress'? Is freedom always > progress? From what point-of-view? > > > Marsha > > > > At 09:11 AM 4/14/2009, you wrote: > >Hi Marsha, KO, DMB, et al: > > > >The big thing missing from current evolution theories and applications > is > >any notion of things getting better or, as we MOQer's believe, progress > >towards greater freedom and versatility. It has always bothered me that > >precious little attention is paid to ever expanding consciousness over > time > >from the first little wiggle of life to the worldly mind of a Mozart or > an > >Einstein. In other words, science, totally dependent on measurable > surface > >data, has largely been unable to deal with the steady evolutionary > >expansion of interior awareness, the real indicator of Dynamic > progress, > >"Are you better off as a woman than a mouse?" The MOQ answer: "You > betcha." > >That's progress! > > > >Platt Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
