Hi All,

I believe there is pure science and applied science.  It takes a lot of money 
to conduct science these days.  We are also in a capitalist system where 
everything needs to be justified by return on investment.  Because of this, 
science today is mainly applied science.  I hear screams of anguish from the 
tax payer when goldfish behavior is being funded..  It is all so money driven.  
I have worked in science for many years, and find some of the joy is removed by 
the "bottom line".  That is not to say that science does not provide comfort in 
many cases.  But I would agree that the greed of our system, our insecurity, 
and need for pleasure, has brought out the demon in science.  This is 
everybody's fault, you too Marsha.  

It is a hard balance, for me, to work my profession in biotechnology science 
and maintain a spiritual outlook.  Science has become a manipulative tool that 
seems very short sighted.  I work daily, in my job, to try to mitigate the 
current pleasure principle of science, with reason.  There are some of out 
there working behind the scenes to try to temper the irrational product 
oriented nature of the business.  In the end, it may have always been way out 
of our control anyway.

Cheers,

Willblake2


On Apr 18, 2009, at 6:30:16 PM, "david buchanan" <[email protected]> wrote:

Marsha said to Krimel: Calling my statements "bitching" and "silly" doesn't 
address the issues I raise. Bacon is a man who stated that Nature needed to be 
tortured for her to give up her secrets. Come on...
dmb says:
Yea, come on Krimel. The myth of the mad scientist has been in the popular 
imagination for a couple centuries now. From Frankenstein's monster to Darth 
Vader, the fears inspired by science and technology have taken the shape of 
monsters and villians. Even Kafkaesque nightmares about inhuman bureaucracies 
get at this same fear of faceless, mechanical rationality. Its no use 
pretending you don't know what Marsha is talking about. 
In the case of genetically modified crops, for example, the corporations have 
introduced seeds from which the farmer can not grow the next generation of 
seeds. That way the farmer has to buy new seeds each season. In the interest of 
profit, they've engineered a dead seed. What if this artificial mutation 
spreads to other seed-bearing plants or even all seed-bearing plants. What 
would be left on earth? Not us. The chances are probably very small but with 
consequences like that very small is way too big. 
Its a cultural problem. Its bigger than science. Its about a scientific world 
view, materialism, reductionism and efficiency at the expense of quality. Its 
about being overwhelmed and out of balance. Its about loving power and control 
rather than peace of mind. 
Pretending that Marsha is just making this stuff up won't fly around here. Its 
the problem for which ZAMM is the solution, you big snarky square.. She's 
giving you all kinds of clues but you just stick your fingers in your ears and 
sing "La La La". Its a dern shame.


_________________________________________________________________
Rediscover Hotmail®: Get quick friend updates right in your inbox. 
http://windowslive.com/RediscoverHotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Rediscover_Updates2_042009
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to