Hi Marsha, 2009/4/22 MarshaV <[email protected]>
> > Greetings Will, > > There is no true me. (T)ruth is the discovery that I am false. Yes? > you are a pattern of value - and you said all patterns are true - are you eating your words now? I just want it to be understood clearly,neutrinos and oxytocin aside, that > Science has investigated and studied how to manufacture desire, manufacture > the "wanting", public manipulation; advertising and propaganda, baloney and > garbage, are the child of Science too. > > For a metaphysics that is suppose to be grounded in Radical Empiricism and > Pragmaticism, how is one suppose to act on information created by Science > when it cannot be experienced and is profit-driven? Trust? Is this an > unimportant question? Maybe this should be answered by those who want to > say that Scientific patterns are more than just conceptual constructs. What > does Science know, and how does it know it? > The scientific method is sound - if science has a bad side it is through its misuse by the people who do that science. Science did not invent gravity - but science makes gravity more useful since we understand better how it behaves -KO Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
