"I think the quality personal insight is wholly separate from the group consciousness insight. One cannot feel the other."
I read that article about the Death of Philosophy and have been thinking a great deal about it... so pardon if I just go off on you here without much further ado, but I'd say pretty much the opposite - isn't quality personal insight defined by group consciousness insight? If nobody hears your tree falling, how do you know it even exists? If there is no external validation of a thought, then it's insanity - not truth. But beyond all this, there is the meaning of meaning - what we share as a group has a consensual aspect - we must agree upon meaning in order for meaning to live. It's fundamental to all philosophy and I don't see how the discovery of this simple and fundamental postulate is any sort of "death" to philosophy, But then I'm just starting on my Royce's Philosophy of Community. What a rich field of research you virtual community of philosophers make as a companion volume! John Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
