Hi Matt.

Excellent. I read the whole thing and posted comments on the blog.
(Can't see them yet.)

Ian

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Matt Kundert
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This is a new bit I wrote, fully housed at my blog, here:
> http://pirsigaffliction.blogspot.com/2009/05/philosophy-metaphysics-and-common-sense.html
>
> It's another attempt to circle Socrates, Plato, Pirsig and Rorty, done mainly 
> through narrative.
> So if one is looking for metaphysical principles, or the like, one would be 
> disappointed.  I'll tease it with the first 500 words to help decide whether 
> it's worth reading the rest:
>
>
>
> Socrates essentially defined philosophy as a common, basic
> human activity when he said that the
> unexamined life is not worth living.  Plato said that philosophy was for the 
> very
> few people who were able
> to do it.  Pirsig said philosophy isn’t worth doing if it
> doesn’t help with life.  Rorty said
> philosophy is pretty
> remote from life.
>
>
>
> Is there a way of coordinating all of these thoughts?  Do they all fit 
> together?  I think they can, in their
> way, fit together
> coherently, but there have been better and worse ways of construing them.
>
>
>
> Socrates came upon the Greek scene at a very important point
> in its cultural evolution.  For some
> years,
> leisured aristocrats had begun popping up around the Aegean Sea and
> composing themselves in a manner
> that had previously been unheard of—our first
> intellectuals.  They for the most part
> had begun speculating
> about the way reality as a whole functioned, though they
> did occasionally drift into the way humanity,
> specifically, functioned (humans
> being a natural enough subject within the purview of “reality”).  These
> drifts didn’t pick up speed until
> democracy had taken hold in Greece.  The
> hold of democracy on Athens
> produced a shift in the educational institutions of
> Greece.  The existence of a citizen class
> in Athens
> created a need for a means of educating them, one that surpassed the
> means that existed for the needs of
> fickle aristocracies.  For the first time in history, an opportunity
> was created in which people could live on
> their wits.
>
>
>
> These were the Sophists, the first professional
> intellectuals, and, like most people I know, they soon
> began talking about
> themselves and what they do.  The trouble
> for them was that nobody had really done
> what they did before.  Their only real models were the poets, the
> previous educators of Greece, but the
> poets’ profession had itself begun to
> change, too, at about the same time.  It
> was a common enough
> feature for Greek rhapsodes,
> oral poets, to brood about what they were doing (captured well by Hesiod
> in his
> musings on the Muses) and the earlier physiologoi,
> Thales, Heraclitus and the rest, had themselves
> produced occasional remarks,
> but we can imagine it wasn’t until the pressure of professional
> differentiation
> set in for the Sophists (produced by the high concentration of them in Athens)
> that real
> self-consciousness kicked in.
> The Sophists had to attract customers, which meant not only displaying
> their wares in public, but arguing for why they knew what they were doing, 
> over
> and against their
> competitors.
>
>
>
> What they did, in fact, was increase the ability of
> public speakers to convince their audience that they
> were right.  In Athens, in contrast to today, every man
> was their own politician and
> lawyer.  This meant
> that arguing your
> view (say, of innocence) became dramatically more important than in previous,
>
> aristocratic generations, where oratory was more for the battlefield (the 
> first
> great place you had to
> convince people of doing something, like bleeding).  So the Sophists, our 
> first rhetoricians, began
> to
> reflect . . . .
>
> Matt
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Insert movie times and more without leaving Hotmail®.
> http://windowslive.com/Tutorial/Hotmail/QuickAdd?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_Tutorial_QuickAdd1_052009
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to