Marsha,
But that is what Bo is saying, that only through intellect may we
come to the MoQ.
-Ron




________________________________
From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 8:50:59 AM
Subject: Re: [MD] Protestant Capitalism


Ron,

I'm talking, like Bo, of the explanatory strength of the MOQ.  It seems to me 
that if it is clearly stated that the Intellectual Level is of subject/object 
patterns it becomes very clear that dwelling in the Intellectual Level (no how 
exalted it seems) is not going to get you to the MOQ point-of-view.


Marsha



At 08:43 AM 5/21/2009, you wrote:
> Marsha, I think the point is clinging to that entrapment. It takes a bravery 
> and a fearlessness to overcome it. As the Sophists say and many others, 
> excellence is a practice, like the entrapment. We were taught to practice s/o 
> over a long period of growth like wise we must teach ourselves and reinforce 
> excellence over a long peroid of growth. The impossiblity of escape disolves 
> with the practice of excellence. I have found the four agreements works well 
> within the four levels of excellence and reinforces their meaning. Ruiz says 
> that by slowly breaking the agreements made with the small self and replacing 
> them with the agreements of Quality, through practice we will be free of it. 
> they are:   BE IMPECCABLE WITH YOUR WORD Speak with integrity. Say only what 
> you mean. Avoid using the word to speak against yourself or to gossip about 
> others. Use the power of your word in the direction of truth and love.  
> DON’T TAKE ANYTHING PERSONALLY Nothing
 others do is because of you. What others say and do is a projection of their 
own reality, their own dream. When you are immune to the opinions of others, 
you won’t be the victim of needless suffering.  DON’T MAKE ASSUMPTIONS 
Find the courage to ask questions and to express what you really want. 
Communicate with others as clearly as you can to avoid misunderstandings, 
sadness, and drama. With just this one agreement, you can completely transform 
your life.  ALWAYS DO YOUR BEST Your best is going to change from moment to 
moment; it will be different when you are healthy as opposed  to sick. Under 
any circumstance, simply do your best, and you will avoid self-judgment, 
self-abuse, and regret.       ________________________________ From: MarshaV 
<[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 
5:50:48 AM Subject: Re: [MD] Protestant Capitalism Ron, Don't you think Bo has 
a valid point.  It
 seems impossible to breakaway from the subject/object chatter which is 
entrapment. Marsha At 04:17 AM 5/21/2009, you wrote: >Ron > >On 19 May you 
wrote: > > > Are you saying that Platt is on firm MoQ ground by being > > 
anti-intellectual? > >Yes, the greatest obstacle is the 4th. level because - 
prior to the MOQ >- it was reality  itself  (like the 3rd and 2nd. and 1st 
have been in their >time) Platt isn't "anti-intellectual", but sees the 4th. 
level for >what it is, >namely a static level that refuses a dynamic pattern to 
form a new >reality The MOQ is of course no static level, but in this 
particular >context it has a level-like relationship with intellect. > > > 
Also, are you saying that ALL intellectual patterns are more moral than > > 
social patterns? > >Yes, intellect is the highest static level, yet the mere 
knowledge of the >dynamic/static context (that the upper level is dependent the 
lower >level for its own good) prevents intellect from
 undermining its social >base. The big question is if it prevents the MOQ from 
undermining its >own base - intellect - I mean if it can go on after being 
reduced to a >static level? (footnote). > > > Essentially you are saying that 
no one knows intellectual quality unless > > they subscribe to your SOL. -Ron > 
>That's right, but it isn't really "my SOL" In ZAMM's proto-moq there is >just 
one "static" (classic) level - the SOM - but it's also called >"intellect" >so 
it was clearly Phaedrus's original idea. And in LILA there are many 
>indications that SOM is no foreign matter that has polluted intellect, but 
>the very article. > >IMO > >Bo > > >Footnote: >This is the "intellect joining 
forces with biology to quell society" >phenomenon  brought one notch up. The 
MOQ joining forces with >social value to quell intellect. This would be a 
disaster and why I at >times wonder about the MOQ. It's valid as .... but is it 
GOOD? >Perhaps better let it continue in
 its harmless "academical" vein, letting . >Anthony McWatt and David Buchanan 
be the administrators of Pirsig's >legacy. > > > > > >Moq_Discuss mailing list 
>Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. >http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_d 
iscuss-moqtalk.org >Archives: >http://lists.moqta 
lk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ >http:/ 
/moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ . _____________ The self is a 
thought-flow of ever-changing, interrelated and interconnected, inorganic, 
biological, social and intellectual, static patterns of value responding to 
Dynamic Quality. . . Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. 
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: 
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ 
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ Moq_Discuss mailing list 
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. 
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives:
 http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ 
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/


.
_____________

The self is a thought-flow of ever-changing, interrelated and interconnected, 
inorganic, biological, social and intellectual, static patterns of value 
responding to Dynamic Quality.

.
.



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/



      
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to