Ron

On 19 May you wrote:
  
> Are you saying that Platt is on firm MoQ ground by being
> anti-intellectual?

Yes, the greatest obstacle is the 4th. level because - prior to the MOQ 
- it was reality  itself  (like the 3rd and 2nd. and 1st have been in their 
time) Platt isn't "anti-intellectual", but sees the 4th. level for what it is, 
namely a static level that refuses a dynamic pattern to form a new 
reality The MOQ is of course no static level, but in this particular 
context it has a level-like relationship with intellect. 

> Also, are you saying that ALL intellectual patterns are more moral than
> social patterns?

Yes, intellect is the highest static level, yet the mere knowledge of the 
dynamic/static context (that the upper level is dependent the lower 
level for its own good) prevents intellect from undermining its social 
base. The big question is if it prevents the MOQ from undermining its 
own base - intellect - I mean if it can go on after being reduced to a 
static level? (footnote).        

> Essentially you are saying that no one knows intellectual quality unless
> they subscribe to your SOL. -Ron

That's right, but it isn't really "my SOL" In ZAMM's proto-moq there is 
just one "static" (classic) level - the SOM - but it's also called "intellect"  
so it was clearly Phaedrus's original idea. And in LILA there are many 
indications that SOM is no foreign matter that has polluted intellect, but 
the very article.   

IMO

Bo


Footnote:
This is the "intellect joining forces with biology to quell society" 
phenomenon  brought one notch up. The MOQ joining forces with 
social value to quell intellect. This would be a disaster and why I at 
times wonder about the MOQ. It's valid as .... but is it GOOD?  
Perhaps better let it continue in its harmless "academical" vein, letting . 
Anthony McWatt and David Buchanan be the administrators of Pirsig's 
legacy.   





Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to