Ian: > I said WE should regulate ourselves towards "flourishing" ... what > other aim is there ... I think you show a serious error of imagination
What do you mean by regulate? Regulate how? Ian: > But as I say - I invoke the "life's too short" bow-out from this kind > of aggressive debate. > No fear, I will be giving "your property" a wide berth ;-) Nick: Since you knee-jerked on what the NAP is about, then I think it would proper of you to show courteous behavior, but of course that's a moral value I highly recognize and would never try to force you to do it. I see you left out "government" in this post as by nature you advocating for it is an advocation for initiation of physical coercion. I've shown intellectually the empirical results. It's called basing moral values on facts, and liberty is stubborn that way. :-) Nick -- Be Yourself @ mail.com! Choose From 200+ Email Addresses Get a Free Account at www.mail.com Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
