I said WE should regulate ourselves towards "flourishing" ... what other aim is there ... I think you show a serious error of imagination ...
But as I say - I invoke the "life's too short" bow-out from this kind of aggressive debate. No fear, I will be giving "your property" a wide berth ;-) Ian On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 6:19 PM, blue-jay maple<[email protected]> wrote: > > Ian: >> Nowhere do I argue against liberty. >> You are very "aggressive" to argue with Nick. >> Intended ? Threat ? Initiate ? WTF ? > > Nick: > Ian, you said "we are government". That's a serious error > in understanding what government is: a territorial, political > monopoly (a government monopoly is coercive by nature). > You said humans should be regulated to bias flourishing. Do > even know what you're saying before you say it? You want to > what: socially engineer people, biologically engineer people, > regulate with coercion and cause havoc like it's been for decades > now, rid courage, suppress intellectual scientific pursuits, rid art, > kill beauty? The list is longer. > You have said yes to all of these, which all involve initiation of > physical coercion. Surely you didn't know what you actually were > saying or you wouldn't be giving this post of yours to share with me. > > Nick > > -- > Be Yourself @ mail.com! > Choose From 200+ Email Addresses > Get a Free Account at www.mail.com > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
