[Willblake2 to John] Because Quality has direction, that is it is leading evolution, it would seem to me that it is differentiated. It creates hierarchies of SQ/DQ. At one point,I asked if it was similar to the Tao, which in my impression is undifferentiated. The Tao is simply creative in a circular manner, that is, not directional.
[Krimel] This is one of the ideas that has basically run the MoQ into a ditch. Evolution is the end result of massively numerous random walks. Such we can look back, see where we have been and call it "good". But it tells us very little about the future other than that we have an almost unfettered ability to look back at the past and call it "good". I also do not think Tao is circular since that would actually make it directional. [Willblake2] If both the Tao and Quality are considered the underlying fabric of reality. Quality is continually creating a better tapestry. The Tao is creating the same tapestry over and over again. [Krimel] I think there is no distinction between Tao and Quality. I think you are right that there are distinctions that can be made and lots of MoQers make them but for the most parts those distinction diminish the MoQ. [Willblake2] I had another question that I asked, and that was: was Quality monotheistic or pluralistic. Is it the same as Brahman, or is it a guiding force interacting? [Krimel] I think both the MoQ and Taoism are forms of pantheistic monism. But that's just me. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
