At 08:44 PM 6/9/2009, John wrote:
In summation: Is the "undifferentiated aesthetic continuum" the source of
everything, or is the source of everything a DIFFERENTIATED aesthetic
continuum?
Differentiated or Undifferentiated?
I say, differentiated. Otherwise entropy and chaos would be the rule and we
wouldn't be. Pirsig makes it pretty plain which way he leans on the
question. But I don't even take HIS word for everything. I want consensus
here. Give it to me now.
Analogies with chewing gum and hot stoves, not needed.
John the pushy Idealist
Greetings John,
This stopped me even as I wrote it yesterday: Differentiated or
Undifferentiated? I came to the conclusion it was both, like the
Buddhist's two truths, or emptiness is form and form is
emptiness. They are mutually dependent. The differentiated comes
from and returns to the undifferentiated.
Marsha
_____________
"He who neglects the present moment throws away all he has."
(Friedrich von Schiller)
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
