Ron: At the risk of spoiling the positive, constructive turn recently taken here, I think the wiki article on radical empiricism that you quoted recently was extremely destructive. It was a direct hit and shattered Krimel's case into tiny pieces or whirling particles. And what could be more relevant? I think that's what drained the snarky snark out of him and when things starting getting constructive. I could almost hear him thinking, "Hmmm. Maybe dmb isn't an idiot after all". So thank you.
> Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 10:26:03 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [MD] Reductionism > > Dave, Krimel, > I like that this discussion has took a turn > toward getting to the bottom of the dispute in a meaningful way, I have > learned > quite a bit from turning it around at different angles and the conflict is > definitly > one that holds a relevency in current understanding, I know it can't all be > hugs > an kisses but I really learn alot from you two when you go at it > constructivly, > thanks for including me. > -Ron > > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ _________________________________________________________________ Lauren found her dream laptop. Find the PC that’s right for you. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/choosepc/?ocid=ftp_val_wl_290 Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
