Well it helps ME, Matt. I appreciate somebody explaining in detail where the values/betterness dichotomy/ambiguity discussion has been. I figured there was trouble but wasn't sure if it was just all in my head. Thanks.
John On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Matt Kundert <[email protected]>wrote: > (And, note, the very often ignored fact that > Pirsig not only often glosses DQ in betterness-terms, but also > Quality, which creates even more problems for a neutral > reservation of "Quality" for reality-redescriptive duties.) > > I hope perhaps the above will aid in the arrangement of the > conversation. > > Matt > > _________________________________________________________________ > Windows Live™: Keep your life in sync. > http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009 > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > -- ------------ Doing Good IS Being ------------ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
