On Dec 24, 2009, at 1:49 PM, John Carl wrote:
> I don't know what is meant by "unpatterned responses".  In fact, the term
> "un"patterned gives me gas.  It sounds suspiciously like phlogoston to me,
> something postulated in order to fit a pre-formed view, with no empirical
> evidence supporting it whatsoever.  If you said, "pre-patterned" with the
> implication that the human valuing agent (nod to Ham) is going to be doing
> some patterning in the near future, I'd have an idea what you meant.  But as
> it is.....


John, John, John,

Unpatterned experience is direct experience without static patterns of value.  
You do 
no like my use of 'unpatterned experience', you say to hear the term gives you 
gas, 
but I remember you didn't like my definition of the self either.  Both self and 
unpatterned experience cannot be bound by  words, so I grant you that the words 
I use to refer to either are false.


Marsha   




  
_______________________________________________________________________
   
Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...     
 






Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to