Greetings Ham,

I am not sure I understand what you are stating.  I am calling unpatterned 
experience or direct 
experience, as I understand, maybe mistakenly, Ant's quote to suggest, 
experience without patterns 
of interpretation.  The MoQ has the experience (value) coming before the 
projection of the observer 
and the object, and I find that one need not necessarily project them at all.  

I choose 'unpatterned experience' as not to embellish the experience in any way.

And best wishes to you too for this upcoming year.   


Marsha







On Dec 28, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Ham Priday wrote:

> 
> On Dec 28, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Marsha V. wrote:
> 
>> Greetings Ham,
>> 
>> Can there be experience _without_ picking up the thread of
>> mental chatter or an analytical thread?  Yes!   Ant's statement
>> is perfect.  Perfect.  Perfect.  Perfect.  It seems more a matter
>> of awareness of such experiences.
>> 
>> "Immediate experience is experience where there is no distinction
>> between what is experienced and the act of experiencing itself."
>> -- [Anthony McWatt: Pirsig's Metaphysics of Quality]
> 
> What you redundantly praise as "perfect" is the fact that Ant's statement 
> applies to ALL experience.  The "immediate" act of experience and the 
> awareness of something are one and the same phenomenon.  Likewise, being 
> aware is contingent upon a cognizant observer and a referent object. 
> Experiential reality is a dualism of value-sensibility (subjective awareness) 
> and objectivized being (otherness).
> 
> You'll note that Pirsig and I agree that the ground of_existence_is Value 
> (Quality).  But value-sensibility is_our_essence, not the Essence of Reality. 
>  We do not "experience" Value directly.  Value must be realized (made 
> sensible) by an independent agent in order to exist (to be experienced as 
> finite phenomena).  And, since Existence is differentiated from Value in the 
> "act" or process of experience, Existence and Essence are not synomous.
> 
> Pirsig's "metaphysics" never transcended existence.  His Quality hierarchy is 
> based entirely on the experiential (phenomenal) realm   Euphemizing physical 
> existence as experienced patterns of Dynamic Quality does not eliminate 
> subject/object duality.
> 
> Thanks, Marsha.  And best wishes for the new year,
> Ham
> 
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
>> Epistemologically, experience is clearly both an "act" (which is itself
>> differentiated) and the cognizant awareness of "distinctions" or patterns.
>> I call experience the process of "objectivizing", and I distinguish it from
>> value-sensibility which is primary to experience and esthetic or
>> emotional (rather than "intellectual") in nature.  Unfortunately, MoQ's
>> author failed to make this distinction.
>> 
>> But more important to philosophy, I think, is the concept that existence
>> is a differentiated reality in which All is perceived as "each and every"
>> by a subject in relation to its object(s).  Every moment, every experience,
>> every thought, every idea is differentiated from every other.  And the
>> substantive ground of this reality is the Value from which we are each
>> estranged at birth.  We can experience and know only what we construct
>> from this Value -- good, bad, or indifferent.
>> 
>> Yet, the fact that this pluralistic construction is not chaotic but has an 
>> order
>> (or "intelligence", if you will) that is universally apprehended and 
>> appreciated
>> strongly implies a creative source that transcends all difference and 
>> otherness.
>> Although Mr. Pirsig would like us to think of this source as DQ, I cannot
>> accept Quality as an absolute.  Quality for me is only the valuistic 
>> "realization"
>> of otherness, and it requires a sensible agent.  We are all "One in Essence".
>> The source I propose is uncreated, unconditional, and beyond experience.
>> It is the essential "not-other" from which the appearance of otherness is 
>> derived.
>> 
>> Essentially yours,
>> Ham
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

  
_______________________________________________________________________
   
Shoot for the moon.  Even if you miss, you'll land among the stars...     
 






Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/

Reply via email to