Sorry for the delay, Craig. New job. Real hours. Many posts to read. S/O is good, not SOM is good. I should have said. Subject Object perception is a useful and fun tool. It's not the basis of being. Cast it away as the basis of being, but don't cast it away as a good and useful tool, is the point I think I remember I was making, but the big "M" is a dirty trouble-maker. I think it even tripped Ron up somewhere in a recent post of his I skimmed through trying to catch up. It stuck in my brain and now I'll have to look for it.
J On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 10:54 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > [John] > > This is the problem so many here have and have had in > > declaiming the subject/object relationship as non-fundamental and they > end > > up proclaiming it as non-existent! > > SOM - is Good > > If you're saying the subject/object relationship is non-fundamental, > why are you saying "SOM - is Good"? > Craig > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/ > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org.uk/pipermail/moq_discuss_archive/
