On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 2:13 PM, david buchanan <[email protected]>wrote:
> ... I can't say that I regret discouraging your man. But maybe this > explanation - as to why I can't say I'm sorry - will help a little. O...M...G... How's the view from your high horse? >attempts by various theists to highjack the MOQ What the Freak? Wouldn't it have to be a "thing" in order to be hijacked? And where did these theists try to take it? Aren't you just another (whatever you are), trying to make it your thing? Quality belongs to whoever wants it, is willing to grasp it, and try to understand it - whoever - including theists. Can YOU protect the MoQ? Is that your job here? Isn't this list a group of people, trying together to go deeper, get "it"? So is "it" only what you have decided it is (or isn't)? He asks for you to reiterate all your great points, because he still hasn't seen them. One would think that someone with such outstanding credentials would be happy to teach their great wisdom, but you repeatedly tell him that you shouldn't need to, it's all been said, and then accuse him of throwing tantrums - He doesn't throw tantrums - THIS? NOW THIS IS A TANTRUM! You have irritated ME, and I do know how to throw a tantrum. Specious and fallacious argumentation, like an annoying fly buzzing around one's head, irritates, but believe me, is not enough to discourage my tenacious man. Only those who have his respect are able to discourage him. Sorry to disillusion you, but the discouragement came in response to someone else's reply. Lu Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
