gav, I agree completely. And I'd concur by pointing to the value in the * Varieties* of Experience - religious, and otherwise. It is diversity which leads to realization of what is good. Sticking with one conceptualization is what blinds the man to the elephant.
"But James's own robust faith was that the very caprices of the spirit are the opportunity for the building up of the highest forms of the spiritual life; that the unconventional and the individual in religious experience are the means whereby the truth of a superhuman world may become most manifest. It is the spirit of the frontiersman, of the gold seeker, or the home builder, transferred to the metaphysical and to the religious realm. Experience alone can guide us towards the place where these things are; hence you indeed need experience You can only win your way on the frontier in case you are willing to live there. Be, therefore, concrete, be fearless, be exerimental. But above all, let not your abstract conceptions, even if you call them scientific, pretend to set any limits to the richness of spiritual grace, to the glories of spiritual possession, that, in case you are duly favored, your personal experience may reveal to you. James reckons that the tribulations with which abstract scientific theories have beset our present age are not to be compared with the glory that perchance shall be, if only we open our eyes to what experience itself has to reveal to us." William James and the Philosophy of Life, author unknown (not really) Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
