Hi Marsha and John,

John, I get a kick out of Hitchens.  He's the only guy I know who'll show up
on Bill Maher with a drink in his hand in a clear glass.  Everybody else
hides theirs in a coffee cup.  

...And I didn't know atheists were required to be scientists.  Am I gonna
have to go back to school?  

Marsha, thanks for all the quotes.  P. really knows how to put that Social
Level in its place.

Best to you two,
Mary

> 
> I gotta go so I don't have much time this morning Marsh, but seems to
> me if
> an atheist doesn't have his science right, he hasn't got much of
> anything.
> 
> And you do know that Krauss is an atheist as well, don't you.
> 
> John the enticed by the assertion of "anthropic principles" which
> sounds
> like biocentricism is a cool direction to go.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 4:17 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Dawkins and Hitchens are my heros because they are brave, courageous
> > and bold atheists, not because they have their science right.   In
> the past
> > I have complained about the science, you know that, but I still see
> it as
> > more
> > dynamic than the theist bs.
> >
> > And just for the record:
> >
> >
> > "The MOQ supports religion but does not support many Christian
> traditions."
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> > The MOQ is an atheistic religious outlook that solves rather than
> bypasses
> > religious problems.
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> > "Quality is nature. The MOQ says there is no spiritual principle in
> man
> > that
> > makes knowledge possible. Nature does the whole job."
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> > "The MOQ does not rest on faith. In the MOQ faith is very low quality
> > stuff, a
> > willingness to believe falsehoods."
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> > "The MOQ would add a fourth stage where the term "God" is completely
> > dropped
> > as a relic of an evil social suppression of intellectual and Dynamic
> > freedom. The
> > MOQ is not just atheistic in this regard. It is anti-theistic."
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> > "The selling out of intellectual truth to the social icons of
> organized
> > religion is
> > seen by the MOQ as an evil act."
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> > "Faith is not required for an understanding of Quality. Here Quality
> > succeeds
> > where Bradley's Absolute and Hegel's Being and the Buddhist
> Nothingness
> > and the Hindu Oneness and the theists' God and Allah and you-name-it,
> all
> > of them fail. For Quality, no faith is required because there is no
> way you
> > can
> > disbelieve that there is such a thing as quality. You cannot conceive
> of or
> > live
> > in a world in which nothing is better than anything else."
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> > "For quality, no faith is required because there is no way you can
> > disbelieve
> > that there is such a thing as quality."
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> > "When you hear the words 'spirit' and 'faith' always look for a
> traditional
> > religionist
> > trying to sneak his goods in the back door. ...like the positivists,
> the
> > MOQ drops
> > spirit and faith, cold."
> >   (Pirsig, Copleston Annotations)
> >
> >
> >
> > Marsha
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Apr 23, 2010, at 6:50 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
> >
> > > ID ? err no ...
> > > Marsha, you must be misunderstanding the argument (you and a
> million
> > > physicists & scientists, so no worry)
> > >
> > > ID is mentioned as an example of the reactionary crap that is
> > > generated by NOT addressing the fact the (current) universe was/is
> > > fine-tuned to carbon-based intelligent life. No "I" in that, just
> > > physics.
> > >
> > > You are backing the wrong horse with Dawkins ;-)
> > > Ian
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:37 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I.D.?  Are you kidding?      I'm with Dawkins.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Apr 23, 2010, at 6:13 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Larry Krauss is quoted by someone I've been following following
> for a
> > >>> few years - a guy called Rick Ryals (aka Island) writing about
> the
> > >>> significance of Anthropic Principles.
> > >>>
> > >>> Start here: http://knol.google.com/k/the-anthropic-principle#
> > >>>
> > >>> There is something seriously amiss at the core of of fundamental
> > physics.
> > >>> Ian
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:18 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Lawrence Krauss Discussion (1/12) - Richard Dawkins
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZLctxRf7duU
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Apr 22, 2010, at 6:27 PM, Fam. Kintziger-Karaca wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/krauss06/krauss06.2_index.html
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> for quantum-marsha
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ___
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > >>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > >>>> Archives:
> > >>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > >>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> > >>>>
> > >>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > >>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > >>> Archives:
> > >>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > >>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ___
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > >> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > >> Archives:
> > >> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > >> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> > >>
> > > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > > Archives:
> > > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
> >
> >
> > ___
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to