Bodvar to Krimel: This leads to the false impression that there remains an unscathed Quality atop the DQ/SQ dichotomy, and made the latter-day Pirsig (in the Summary of 2005) say that the MOQ is the "static" part of a still greater Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics. This is horribly wrong IT IS QUALITY WHICH IS DIVIDED!
Andre: The 'false impression' is entirely yours Bodvar. Quality remains 'unscathed' because it cannot be scathed. Static patterns of value are abstracted from the (Quality) stimulus... . DQ, as used in LILA in this instance,(it is used as denoting Quality and other times as the referent to...) is used as a static intellectual reference to Quality! All concepts need to be kept out of Quality. You cannot accept this, I know but because of your non acceptance you reach the 'Quality/MOQ meta-metaphysics result which is complete cowdung. Quality CANNOT BE DIVIDED! Back to kinder Bodvar with a copy of Anthony's PhD and LILA. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
