Perhaps Marsha, It just doesn't work for me, though. I tend to think of Quality as Fullness.
Emptiness as a word does not do the concept of co-dependent arising justice. Maybe it is in the translation to English. However, once redefined through personal understanding of what the word is suppose to mean, then I guess it is as good a word as any. Every discipline has its own dictionary. Quality may be arising from Emptiness, what do you think? Mark On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 9:01 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think it is acceptable within the MoQ to consider Emptiness equivalent to > Quaiity... > > > Emptiness & Quantum Mechanics (8 minutes) > by B. Alan Wallace > > > > http://web.me.com/ksnowsb108/B._Alan_Wallace_Podcasts/Podcast/Entries/2009/2/7_Emptiness_%26_Quantum_Mechanics.html > > > Bio: Dr. Wallace, a scholar and practitioner of Buddhism since 1970, has > taught Buddhist theory and meditation worldwide since 1976. Having devoted > fourteen years to training as a Tibetan Buddhist monk, ordained by H. H. the > Dalai Lama, he went on to earn an undergraduate degree in physics and the > philosophy of science at Amherst College and a doctorate in religious > studies at Stanford. > > > > > ___ > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
