Hello everyone On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 4:40 PM, X Acto <[email protected]> wrote: > John, Dan, > > It seems there are differing aspects of Quality being discussed. > > The arguement focusing on which types of Quality are best. > > While re-examining the root, as Dan suggests, can elimenate alot > > of false dilemma and reinstate what has greater meaning in ones life, > > we do so from an intellectual perspective, which is what I believe John > > is driving at, clarity of meaning in our lives. > > This not only begins with this re-evaluation of the organic experience, but it > > guides and drives our social and intellectual values as well. > > Organic quality would not have the same pleasure of experience if it was > > not shared socially or reflected apon, for greater understanding > intellectually > > which is the true flower of the totality of experience. > > Would'nt one say that greater understanding has resulted in better organic > Quality? > > better social Quality? > > Doesent it make our reasons for holding certain organic and social values > > better by constantly reflecting and re-defining them? > > concerning the ego climber, who is it that asserts the ego more? > > the one examing the self and defining it with their values or the one > > denying it exists? > > is not denial of self one of the most insidious acts of selfishness?
Dan: Hi Ron I don't know for sure, but I would say that the selfless existence doesn't mean denying the self so much as it means realizing the self doesn't exist in light of the Buddha's teachings. Thank you, Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
