On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:03 PM, 118 wrote: > Marsha: > I never stated that the MoQ could be described by neti-neti. I was saying > to > Dan that all this talk it not Quality(Ultimate Truth). > > I do not understand your complaint? > > Mark: > My complaint was that I do not understand what you are saying. Could all > this talk be considered attempts at a metaphysical description of Quality? > > I have not read all of your correspondence with Dan on this subject, so > perhaps I should not just jump in. I will try to get full understanding > before I just take a statement and run with it, so as not to waste your > time. I can see you are getting frustrated with my inane questions and I > beg your forgiveness. Gracias (as John would say). >
Hi Mark, Sorry, Mark, maybe you are projecting your frustration on to me. I was suggesting to Dan with my words 'not this, not that' that when all is said and done, if I may use an analogy; the words on the menu are not the food. Please feel free to explain neti-neti to your liking. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
