On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:16 PM, 118 wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:09 AM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Oct 22, 2010, at 1:44 AM, 118 wrote: >> >>> inferred that you were reasoning that Quality was analogous to not this, >>> not that. Clearly I was mistaken. You were simply stating that Quality >> can >>> not be described with words. OK, I get it. How is it then that you >> discuss >>> it? >> >> Marsha: >> The point is I don't talk about it. Using intellect to talk about Quality, >> reifies it, >> and it is not this, not that. I experience it as unpatterned, and >> patterned flow, >> after that nothing fits well. If you want to talk about Intellectual Level >> patterns, >> or Social Level patterns, or Biological Level patterns, or Inorganic Level >> patterns, I think there is lots to consider and discuss. >> > > The point is that while you do not talk about it, you certainly write about > it, unless you are in the wrong forum. Your description of experience is > shorthand at best There are at least four words there that need > interpretation (and one of those is not "I", which can also be included). > So, let's talk about the expression of quality in the subjects you > reference above. You can consider it not really talking about Quality if > that makes more sense to you. > > Mark
Hi Mark, The Dynamic aspect of Quality is unknowable, indivisible, undefinable. Static patterns of value are ever-changing, relative, impermanent habit that is able to be conceptualized. The four levels are interrupted and defined with slight differences dependent on an individuals past static pattern history. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
