On 30 Oct 2010 at 20:13, Dan Glover wrote:
> Ron:
> Hello Dan,
> I mean inorganic, organic, social and intellectual betterness.
> Unless you do not think Quality and betterness have the same meaning.
Dan:
No, not in this context. You are talking about static patterns of
value. Dynamic Quality is what's better. It is what drives static
quality patterns towards "betterness," an undefined "somethingness"
that isn't a thing at all. Once defined, it is gone... poof. Like a
puffy white cloud in a clear blue summer sky... now it is here, now it
is not. Where does it come from, and where does it go? It is a
meaningless question. It is not a place at all. We are using
intellectual concepts to point to that which is beyond conception. How
can there be four when there isn't even one?
Platt]
If his past remarks are any indication Dan won't appreciate my agreeing with
him. But, at the risk of implanting the kiss of death I say, "Right on."
My answer to what is betterness is whatever improves responsivness to DQ.
.
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
