On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:50 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 30 Oct 2010 at 20:13, Dan Glover wrote:
>
>> Ron:
>> Hello Dan,
>> I mean inorganic, organic, social and intellectual betterness.
>> Unless you do not think Quality and betterness have the same meaning.
>
> Dan:
> No, not in this context. You are talking about static patterns of
> value. Dynamic Quality is what's better. It is what drives static
> quality patterns towards "betterness," an undefined "somethingness"
> that isn't a thing at all. Once defined, it is gone... poof. Like a
> puffy white cloud in a clear blue summer sky... now it is here, now it
> is not. Where does it come from, and where does it go? It is a
> meaningless question. It is not a place at all. We are using
> intellectual concepts to point to that which is beyond conception. How
> can there be four when there isn't even one?
>
> Platt]
> If his past remarks are any indication Dan won't appreciate my agreeing with
> him. But, at the risk of implanting the kiss of death I say, "Right on."
>
> My answer to what is betterness is whatever improves responsivness to DQ.
>
> .
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
