Hello everyone On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:21 PM, 118 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dan, > Thanks for the Tao. I have a number of different translations, each > provides some insight. I think such a concept is appropriate to mention > here, as a tag to another path for arriving at the same. I would also add > that any concept contains the suggestion you put forward, Dynamic Quality is > not alone or special in this sense. Try approaching any concept at all. We > simply divide it further an further, without approaching it.
Hi Mark The translations don't matter... the analogy is what we are after. No, you do not get it yet. You're thinking way too much; you know way too much. Forget all that crap you think you know and listen to what I am saying. Yes, I realize you're a smart guy. That and a buck will get you cup of coffee. Go and re-read the books, both ZMM and LILA. Until then, you are just wasting your time and mine. I am speaking bluntly but I don't need any of your insults in return. You are simply not getting what I am trying to tell you. And remember, you asked me. I didn't ask you. Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
