> > Ok Dan, I must be really stupid then. It's possible. Could you please > explain to me, a stupid man, what is truly static in experience? Because > that was really the only point I have to make and if you think I'm wrong, > then simply demonstrate to me some "thing" that is truly static and I'll > shut up. > > I agree with you. I've been over this with John before but I don't > think he ever really got it. At least not so that I can see in reading > his posts. > > This discussion group is centered around the MOQ and therefore we need > to be precise in using terms consistent with it. Otherwise, we are > just telling each other stories. Like you said, it is about more than > typos or spelling errors... we all commit those from time to time; I > forget to use my spellchecker all the time. Still, by participating > here, we have an obligation to the MOQ and to be precise with the > terms used therein. > > John:
I agree completely. So since you relish precision, please use some and tell me what you mean when you use "static" as a descriptor? dan: > It's only natural to disagree about some things but there are certain > basic meanings and common denominators within the MOQ to which we need > to adhere, otherwise confusion arises. Dynamic and static quality are > certainly two terms that deserve clarity. Mixing and matching them > does no one any good. > > John: Acting like they are self-obviously distinct when they are not, does no one any good either. "The only true constant is change" I asserted. I don't know if that agrees with your cabalistic moq-terminology, but it's true as hell. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
