Andre, My understanding is that static patterns of value are ever-changing, but change in a stable, predictable pattern.
Please note the word 'stable.' Marsha On Mar 20, 2011, at 4:33 AM, Andre Broersen wrote: > John asked, and Mary seconded: > > can you demonstrate any object or pattern that is truly static, in all of > experience? > > Andre: > Just a quick one here. The key words here are 'in all of experience'. The MOQ > is a static intellectual pattern of value. The question suggests that > Pirsig's MOQ IS experience, IS reality. This is NOT the case. It is a static > (i.e. stable)intellectual description of... . > > It is a finger pointing towards. > > DQ is a static INTELLECTUAL REFERENCE to Quality. Experience cannot be > contained IN a metaphysics no matter what it is called. This has been the > fallacy of the 'container problem'. The MOQ is a static intellectual > description of experience. It is NOT the experience itself. > > Is this so difficult to fathom? > > The logical conclusion towards which John, Mary, Mark , Marsha (did I leave > anyone out?) are driving is nihilism, absolute relativism (and nothing > in-between), frivolity, illusion. It stops all conversation, all dialogue > because all is ever changing, nothing to hang your hat on...the street I > walked on 2 minutes ago a roaring river the next (and I forgot to bring my > boat). This is fallacy! > > It is just silly. No, it is intellectually insulting and dishonest...Pirsig's > LILA is quite clear on this. Start reading ....again. > ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
