Mark to Andre:

I am not sure if preserve is the correct term here.

Andre:
Actually, Mark I was using Pirsig's own terminology (not that this carries much 
weight anymore for some on this discuss). He was saying that: 'Static quality 
patterns are dead when they are exclusive, when they demand blind obedience and 
suppress Dynamic change.(for example: religious dogma)'Although Dynamic 
Quality, the Quality of freedom, creates this world in which we live, these 
patterns of static quality, the quality of order, preserve our world. Neither 
static nor Dynamic Quality can survive without the other'.(LILA, p 124)( for 
example: the maintenance workers; they fix things, replace parts, sometimes 
requiring a complete overhaul, they preserve existing patterns through Dynamic 
intervention... until something better comes along and the entire pattern is 
changed. This may involve some, or all the levels).

Mark:
With his division, Pirsig is able to convey the difference between change, and 
what the change is acting on.  In this way they are very different concepts.  
It would be like discussing the continents and plate tectonics.  Obviously the 
two are not the same.

Andre:
Not sure what you're getting at here Mark. Pirsig convey's the difference 
between static quality and Dynamic Quality. I don't know anything about 
tectonics but 'continents' are in/organic patterns of value and the theory of 
tectonics (continental drift?) is an intellectual explanation of their birth, 
movement and disappearance.(?)

Mark:
If the intent was to present a static metaphysics in its complete form, he 
would have called it the Metaphysics of Quality, but he did not.

Andre:
Duh? Pirsig's MOQ is a static intellectual pattern of value, and as such is 
provisional. You do know what LILA means?

Mark:
Certainly Lila can serve as a guide for many, but strict adherence to the words 
was not the intent of this philosophical musing, in my opinion...This forum 
provides the platform for further questioning along the same lines as presented.

Andre:
Agree completely. It is 'a finger pointing to the moon' as the saying goes. I 
just try to keep 'the moon' in mind and not anything else.



Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to