Hello everyone On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:04 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > [Dan] >> the Dynamic Quality we are discussing is not "Dynamic Quality." >Craig: > Where is Platt when we need him? He was particularly good at exposing such > self-defeating > psuedo-philosophy as: "Nothing exists", "There is no truth" or "DQ is not > DQ".
Dan: Come on, Craig. That isn't what I am saying. Get with it. Besides, Adrie told us where Platt is... he is in Platt-a-gone- ia. I am not saying Dynamic Quality is not Dynamic Quality. I am saying the term we use for "it" is not "it". Dynamic Quailty is an intellectual static pattern pointing to "it". If you think that's psuedo-philosophy, then what are you doing here? > > [Dan] >> Do you see what we are saying now? > > >Craig: > Alas, yes. Fortunately the error is so elementary, that I'm > confident you will see it too. Dan: Fine. Have it your way. But as Dean Wormer once said, "Fat, drunk, and stupid is no way to go through life, son." Dan Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
