dmb,

Did Ron respond to only these specific few sentences, or the entire 
paragraph posted , or are you just hankering to be on the soapbox again? 


Marsha



On Apr 20, 2011, at 9:22 AM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> 
> Marsha said to Ron:
> .., I would have to say NO, I do not stand for any-thing.  If you recognize 
> "me" standing for something, I would suspect you are recognizing social  and 
> intellectual patterns we both share: patterns that attract and patterns that 
> repel.  If you want me to admit an "intention," it would be to become 
> "unattached" to these patterns.
> 
> Ron replied:
> Why  fight being human, refine it dont deny it. if we are composed of value, 
> doesent it make more sense to develop those value than to try to escape them?
> 
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> As Pirsig points out in a not yet published forward to Lila, the three main 
> characters are composed of different levels of value and that is why they do 
> not like each other or even understand each other. Lila is dominated by 
> biological values. Intellectually she is nowhere and socially - as a former 
> prostitute with mental health issues - she is about as far down the scale as 
> one can get. Rigel is dominated by social level values. He doesn't care if 
> the MOQ makes sense or not, he just knows it doesn't conform with his very 
> conventional ideas about what's moral. And then there is the intellectual 
> author. About the only thing that Lila and Rigel have in common is that they 
> both dislike his fancy book learning and feel put down or put off by it. And 
> it seems to me that Rigel has fewer options because intellectual values are 
> off the table for him and Lila is more or less reduced to basic survival and 
> has about as much freedom as a sophisticated animal.
> 
> I mean, enlightenment is not the same thing as regression, retardation, 
> reduction or the lack of growth. Peace of mind and suicide are two completely 
> different things. The lack of attachment is not the same thing as apathy or 
> nihilism or otherworldly, life-hating asceticism. The MOQ's ideas are 
> supposed to serve life, not deny or negate it. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>                                         
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to