Ron,

I reject your analysis.  But thanks for the projection; it's always 
interesting.  


Marsha  

Marsha,
Then you are rejecting a philosophical question not a subjective analysis.

The Question:
 if we are composed of value, 
> doesent it make more
> sense to develop those value than to try to escape them?





On Apr 20, 2011, at 8:53 AM, X Acto wrote:

> 
> 
> Hello Ron,
> 
> Having stated that the "Cartesian 'Me" is an illusion, and the definition of 
> self is a flow of ever-changing, interdependent, impermanent inorganic, 
> biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value, I would have to 
> say NO, I do not stand for any-thing.  If you recognize "me" standing for 
> something, I would suspect you are recognizing social  and intellectual 
>patterns 
>
> we both share: patterns that attract and patterns that repel.  If you want me 
>to 
>
> admit an "intention," it would be to become "unattached" to these patterns.  
> That doesn't mean destroy them, it means to become unattached.  If this all 
> sounds too lofty to be "real," I'll confess that the "Cartesian Me" pattern 
> has 
>
> me in it's grip far, far FAR too often. I am "human, all too human."  
> 
> 
> 
> Marsha  
> 
> Marsha,
> Why  fight being human, refine it dont deny it. if we are composed of value, 
> doesent it make more
> sense to develop those value than to try to escape them?
> 
> -Ron
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Apr 18, 2011, at 11:14 PM, X Acto wrote:
> 
>> well, maybe perhaps one day you'll actually stand for something.
>> 
>> I think you already do
>> 
>> but you have yet to admit it.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: MarshaV <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Sent: Mon, April 18, 2011 4:58:28 AM
>> Subject: Re: [MD] [Bulk] Re: the story of "me"
>> 
>> 
>> Interesting Ron,  
>> 
>> I had lunch with a friend early last week, and as we were talking, 
>> I was realizing that my words were not really True.  We were discussing 
>> experiences in other countries.  And it made me uncomfortable to give 
>> any opinion at all.  What I spoke of my experiences in Italy, would be 
>> different if I explained them to someone else, or explained them on 
>> different day.  They'd have been different if I were talking at a different 
>> hour.  These Italian utterances were so transitory.  The talk was harmless 
>> enough, so I chalked it up to being social.  But it made me squirm none 
>> the less because it represents all semantic expression.  
>> 
>> Maybe this will help you see why bottom line is always "not this, not 
>> that."    
>>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 17, 2011, at 11:43 PM, X Acto wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi Ron,
>>> 
>>> Are you suggesting that we add 'stories' as another synonym too, and I 
>>> forgot 
>
> 
>>> Good.  
>>> 
>>> Really, are you suggesting that these are additional synonyms?  Or 
>>> something 

>>> else.
>>> I'd like to know how you're thinking about this.  
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Marsha  
>>> 
>>> Marsha,
>>> I'm going after general meanings of the terms we use, I think :
>>> Good
>>> Choice
>>> preference
>>> selection
>>> Value
>>> And yes freedom
>>> 
>>> All have meaning very similar to the word Quality
>>> 
>>> I think our stories our biographies tell more about our values
>>> than any concept of a cartesian self.
>>> 
>>> I venture to suppose that our stories are our static values.
>>> And I believe we do have a choice in following them or not.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Apr 17, 2011, at 9:38 AM, MarshaV wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> But it sounds like you are saying you are assigning 'choice' and 'freedom' 
>>>> as 
>>
>> 
>> 
>>>> additional synonyms for Quality.  So synonyms for Quality are Value, 
>>>> Experience,
>>>> Morality, Choice, and Freedom.  Are there more?  Is that what you are 
>>>> saying, 
>>
>> 
>> 
>>>> that 
>>>> 
>>>> choice and freedom are additional synonyms?  Or are those synonyms for 
>>>> static 
>>
>> 
>> 
>>>> quality alone?  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html



___


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to