Marsha,
Yes, we are in some agreement.  I thought we were.  Even saying
"analogy all the way down" is an analogy.
Thanks,
Mark

On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 11:30 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello Mark,
>
> I think we are very close in understanding 'neti-neti.'  I am very
> comfortable considering DQ to be 'not this, not that.'  I also use
> the phrase as a reminder that these discussions are analogy
> all the way down, and words used to explain are NOT the
> the fundamental nature of reality, neither is the map, the menu,
> or the finger.  'Not this, not that' is a wonderful recognition of the
> present.   imho.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 23, 2011, at 12:05 PM, 118 wrote:
>
>> Hi Marsha,
>> I just got to this post to me.  Thanks for the question and open
>> dialogue.  I am happy to present my opinion of neti-neti.  I have the
>> sense that you already know what it means.  Any meaningful exchange
>> should come through dialogue which is difficult in this format since
>> while you can read my words, you cannot read the intonation of such,
>> or look at my expressions while talking.  Obviously the fewer words
>> used is better (not this, not that is only four), but at the expense
>> of misdirection I will try a few more.  I will try to frame my
>> exposition in MoQ terms, as I understand it.
>>
>> First the small print so that my words do not get thrown to the wolves.
>> This is my opinion, and I am not proclaiming a Truth, but a personal
>> awareness.  I can provide posted signs only.  Any interpretation of
>> these words is your responsibility, not my doing.  I can be held
>> responsible for further explaining what I write right now, and can
>> also be responsible if I change my mind some time in the future
>> (outside of the moments of this particular writing).   Neti-neti
>> cannot be subjected to the equations of words.  Such an equation is a
>> finger pointing.  When I use the word "is", in some cases, it is with
>> metaphorical intent.
>>
>> With that said, there are probably a thousand ways to explain
>> neti-neti.  First the part about what it is not.  Neti-neti is not for
>> creating an object.  By saying that neti-neti IS something we miss the
>> point.  Such an action relegates the phrase into the static world.  It
>> is an awareness and not a Truth.  It is used to bring about some
>> enlightenment for those who are ready (I am not ready, by the way).
>>
>> One way to start is to present neti-neti 'as'  Dynamic Quality.  Now,
>> that IS ineffable, and is also what you also correctly (imo) say.
>> This of course does not explain anything.  One way to get to neti-neti
>> is through mindfulness.  But, this is a technique and not an
>> explanation.  If we try to remove ourselves from the static world that
>> our intellect creates, we are left with the moment.  Let's call that
>> the pre-intellectual although this is not quite correct, since the
>> intellect also occurs in the moment.  But at least this way I will
>> conform with the vernacular of this forum.  What is actually happening
>> in the pre-intellectual?  We cannot explain it, since in reality it
>> doesn't exist but is evolving from nanosecond (or less) to nanosecond.
>> Yet, we know personally that it exists.  So, something that we know
>> exists, but we can never find 'is' neti-neti.  It is not an illusion
>> or delusion by any means, it is very real.
>>
>> I could go on, but I will leave it at that for feedback if you wish.
>> Your interpretation will certainly help me grow.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 11:56 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>>
>>> I really would like to hear from you on the subject of 'neti-neti' -
>>> 'not this, not that.'  I suppose I use it to cut through the fog of my
>>> mental assumptions, to remind myself that these patterns are
>>> ever-changing, interdependent, and impermanent.  If I am
>>> greatly misinterpreting the phrase, please correct me.  I will
>>> seriously consider what you say.
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha
>
>>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to