On May 23, 2011, at 11:23 AM, John Carl wrote: > Hello Marsha, > > Let's just cut to the chase here. I think the key point I'm disputing with > you is the same as I just posted to Andre - the distinction between knowing > and defining. Please feel free to address my arguments that I posted to > him, and explain how RMP could write, "You can't define Quality but you KNOW > what it is" if definability and knowability are inextricable. > > Thanks Marsha, > > John
Greetings John, I'm sticking to my original statement: DQ is non-dualistic. DQ is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable; there is NO DIVISION, so there is no-thing to know and no one to know it. It is static quality that seems known. Which includes the sense of self. Who is this I/YOU that is defining and knowing? It is a mental construct that exists conventionally, a static pattern that is applied to the flow of experience/ events. Marsha ___ Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
