Hi dmb,
> dmb says: > I wonder if you really do see it that way. From my perspective, I am forced > to argue about the argument because of your distortions. I have to remind of > who said what and why to correct those distortions. I have to deny claims and > statement that you attribute to me even though I never said any such thing > nor believe any such thing. (Asserting free will as a metaphysical entity, > for example, or your conversion of my little self and Big self into gods, to > mention another.) And in this case, you called me all kinds of names for > continuing to participate in an ongoing conversation in which I was named and > quoted. > Think about it, Steve. I complain about your tactics precisely because they > ruin any chance of having a real conversation. > > Either your intentions are malicious or you're just not as smart as I > imagined. Either way, your tactics are bullshit and I'm going to let you get > away with it. As long as you distort things, I will try to straighten them > out. I don't WANT to hurt your feelings but that shit just doesn't fly. > Steve: If you want to find examples of arguing just to argue and examples of distortions, look no further than the above. Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
