Andre to Dave:
Just another insert Dave. When I talked about "Leave it in the weather
for a number of years and yeah, the changes are noticeable because
dynamic influences occur at subatomic levels all the time. But for
pragmatic reasons the notion of using 'ever changing' when you mean
'stable' or 'static' is confusing because misleading"... I should also
have added the 'forces' of regeneration, the stabilizing quality to
latch the advances made. It are these repeated patterns that make them
stable, recognizable.
To add to the confusion Marsha has gotten herself into is that she now
denies DQ as being change. She says: "I consider DQ to be indeterminate
- unknowable, undefinable, and undividable - unpatterned".
Now, on its own this is a bit more like it. BUT she still considers
DQ=sq and sq=DQ. She has said so repeatedly. She considers herself to be
an ever changing pattern of...within a stable whatever. You work it out
Dave because I can't anymore.
I agree with dmb: "sigh".
Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html
