Hi Marsha, Your finding Nada may be a function of how you are looking for it. If you use standard Subject/Object metaphysics, then of course you will find nothing. In the same way that Atman cannot be found in that way. This is one reason why Pirsig does not like that metaphysics. However, if you look beyond that metaphysics, believe me you will find it. Keep hunting, you will see it at at some totally random normal time, this is called enlightenment. There is nothing special about finding it. You will wonder why you didn't see it before since it is so simple. It really does exist. I cannot help you since you are far away.
Good Luck, Mark On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:20 PM, MarshaV <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > It is still speculation and under investigation, but I cannot find anything > INHERENTLY existing. Nada. And I'm not sure what face of Buddha you think I > am aiming for. What do you think of the witnessing experience? > > > Marsha > > > Moq_Discuss mailing list > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org > Archives: > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ > http://moq.org/md/archives.html > Moq_Discuss mailing list Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc. http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org Archives: http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/ http://moq.org/md/archives.html
