Hi Ham,

This is the most interesting topic.   It's a constant question, but I have not 
found an answer.  


On Jul 21, 2011, at 12:28 AM, Ham Priday wrote:

> 
> Dear Marsha --
> 
> On Tuesday, July 19, you said to Joe:
> 
>> I have been puzzling over the experience of subjective
>> consciousness - awareness.  It is experience but I cannot
>> observe it, like an eye cannot see itself.  It seems not to
>> be permanent and seems to control nothing. It witnesses.
>> On investigation this is NOT an autonomous self.  But
>> it is experience and yet not an object of knowledge.
> 
> Did you not read Dave Thomas's post recounting a recent TV appearance of the 
> Dalai Lama?
> 
> [David on 7/18]:
>> I once paraphrased to Marsha that I saw him in a TV clip snap
>> at a questioner who asked him some question about the Buddhist
>> principle of "no-self."I said, because I did not have access to the
>> clip, He said something like (and this really pissed her off),
>> "If you have no self, who is it that is going to change?"
> 
> Ham:
> You don't observe "the experience of subjective awareness" because it's what 
> you ARE.  

Marsha:
The question is am I an 'autonomous' self.  There certainly is experience of 
awareness, but that seems to be just a pattern that occasionally occurs within 
consciousness awareness.  

 
> Ham:
> Like it or not, you are a conscious subject, and subjects can't observe or 
> "witness" themselves as objects.  

Marsha:
There is conscious awareness, and there sometimes is a 'sense of self' that 
occurs, but that is not proof that the 'sense of self' is a real 'autonomous 
self.'   As you admit there is not way the witnessing becomes the object of 
observation.  


> Ham:
> The subjective self and its conscious stream of passing experiences is 
> "permanent" only as long as the being of that self is alive.

Marsha:
There is no way to know what goes on before birth or after death.  And there 
are plenty of times when I am not aware of a 'sense of self'.  In what way can 
it be permanent when it often isn't there.  This 'sense of self 'seems more a 
pattern that sometimes occur within consciousness.    


> Ham:
> Now, you can say that your self is not "real" or is only "interconnected 
> patterns", does not "exist" in the sense that objects exist, and cannot be 
> directly observed in the sense that objects are observed.  Nonetheless, if 
> Marsha's self were removed, Marsha and her reality would disappear.

Marsha:
I am questioning your use of "autonomous"  self, and you are begging the 
question here by assuming "Marsha's self" exists to be removed or disappear.  
  

> Ham:
> I'm curious as to what "investigation" has convinced you that your self is 
> not autonomous.  How does one go about investigating herself?   Brain 
> scanning?  Hypnosis?  Psychotherapy?   And if, as the Dalai Lama suggested, 
> you have no self, who or what is it that makes Marsha's choices and 
> preferences?  Quality patterns?  DQ?  Collective consciiousness?

Marsha:
Meditation and mindfulness are the tools I use to investigate 
mind/consciousness.  My experiences are co-dependent on many conditions 
(patterns), conscious awareness may be one of those conditions.  I do not have 
the exact quote or context for the Dalai Lama statements, so I cannot guess 
what he meant.  But everyone, even the Dalai Lama accepts the conventional use 
of the term self.  The question is what is behind that convention?  That's my 
interest.  And your assumptions are not evidence. 


> Ham:
> Do you really believe yourself to be subservient to the reality you create, 
> Marsha?  

Marsha:
No. I would use the word interconnected rather than subservient.   



> Ham:
> Or are you still puzzling it out?  I would like to believe you KNOW you are a 
> real person with a personna and a self of your own, just like the rest of us. 
>  But your proclaimed "self-denial" has me confused.

Marsha:
I am a conventionally real person.  I have never denied this conventional 
'sense of self.'   But isn't metaphysics a search beyond the conventional?  

You have not answered either of my questions, and I do not find any evidence of 
an autonomous self. 



> 
> Please restore my confidence, Marsha.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Ham
> 


Thank you. 


Marsha


 
___
 

Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html

Reply via email to